A GROUP OF INTERNATIONAL SCIENTISTS AND LEADING EXPERTS HAVE FILED PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRETORIA HIGH COURT SEEKING TO STOP THE USE OF PFIZER’S MRNA JAB.
Accordiing the world expert cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, the case could have ‘global implications.’
Once a proponent of the products, double-jabbed Malhotra lost his father to a heart condition shortly after his booster, and has since changed his stance on the mRNA gene therapy.
The case is an application for judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA products, which are argued to be ‘unsafe and ineffective.’
In a press released Freedom Alliance South Africa (FASA), who are the plaintiffs, are seeking a court order to set aside the government’s authorisation of Pfizer’s jab, stating:
‘In addition to setting out the facts showing an unprecendented rise in vaccine injuries, the papers cite new real-world data analysis which reveals an association with increasing deaths from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Six month data of Pfizer’s own randomised controlled trial revealed an almost 50% increase in death from any cause in the vaccinated (20 deaths) versus unvaccinated (14 deaths).
‘Global data is showing alarming signals and correlations between the administration of Pfizer’s COVID mRNA vaccine products and the unprecedented rise in serious adverse reactions in patients, including disability, foetal abnormalities, aggressive cancers and death. As the global medical community increasingly becomes aware of the problem, the FASA has taken on the government and the medicines regulator SAHPRA, to safeguard public health.
‘…While it has arguably been possible to suppress and distort facts in the public narrative either for or against the vaccines, that will not be possible before our courts.’
Prominent South African neurosurgeon Dr. Herman Edeling is one of the experts witnesses in the case. In his affidavit in support of the application Edeling said, ‘These papers prove that the Comirnaty vaccine cannot, and should never have been branded as ‘safe and effective. The applications set out clear evidence that Pfizer’s vaccine trial for Comirnaty appears to have been a whitewash – mired by what appears to be substantial data manipulation, data inaccuracies, and inaccurate statements of outcome.’
Malhotra reviewed Edeling’s evidence and said the case was ‘factually, medically and scientifically sound.’
‘It is highly likely there would have been substantially less deaths and illness in the global population if the vaccine had never been approved in the first place,’ said Malhotra.
The proceedings were filed on 23 March, and court date has yet to be scheduled.