Injective treatment against compulsory Sars Cov 2 (DL44 / 21) violates freedom and the right to work acquired by birth based on Article 4 of the Italian Constitution.

With this decree law Government aims to prevent the disease and ensure safety conditions in the health sector.

This aim is unattainable as showed in the reports from AIFA, European supervisory institutions such as Euromomo and Eudravigilance; the result is the opposite with an increase of the contagion among people with three doses.

Based on this, to validate the decree law DL44 / 21, not even article 32.2 of the Constitution could be applied as there are no benefits for the community.
According to article 32, the individual cannot be sacrificed for a real or supposed interest of community, and much less without the free and informed consent.

Informed consent is not conceivable in this scenario as the components of the serums are covered by industrial and military secrecy.

After two years neither the components nor the medium- and long-term effects are known, while it is known that in the short term, they have caused thousands of deaths and serious adverse events.
The obligation to vaccinate to work violates articles 4.32 and 36 of the Italian Constitution, various international treaties such as n.953 / 21 2361/21 of the European Union on the prohibition of discrimination based on vaccination status.

Based on the resolution of the Council of Europe 2361/2021; EC Regulations 726/2004 (art 14bis) and 507/2006:
“Every national judge called to give a sentence within the sphere of his/her own competences is obliged to disapply any national legislation contrary to a law of European Union law due to incompatibility with Community rights.

Therefore the psychologist has been readmitted to her work and normal tasks without getting the vaccine

Injective treatment against compulsory Sars Cov 2 (DL44 / 21) violates freedom and the right to work acquired by birth based on Article 4 of the Italian Constitution.

With this decree law Government aims to prevent the disease and ensure safety conditions in the health sector.

This aim is unattainable as showed in the reports from AIFA, European supervisory institutions such as Euromomo and Eudravigilance; the result is the opposite with an increase of the contagion among people with three doses.

Based on this, to validate the decree law DL44 / 21, not even article 32.2 of the Constitution could be applied as there are no benefits for the community.
According to article 32, the individual cannot be sacrificed for a real or supposed interest of community, and much less without the free and informed consent.

Informed consent is not conceivable in this scenario as the components of the serums are covered by industrial and military secrecy.

After two years neither the components nor the medium- and long-term effects are known, while it is known that in the short term, they have caused thousands of deaths and serious adverse events.
The obligation to vaccinate to work violates articles 4.32 and 36 of the Italian Constitution, various international treaties such as n.953 / 21 2361/21 of the European Union on the prohibition of discrimination based on vaccination status.

Based on the resolution of the Council of Europe 2361/2021; EC Regulations 726/2004 (art 14bis) and 507/2006:
“Every national judge called to give a sentence within the sphere of his/her own competences is obliged to disapply any national legislation contrary to a law of European Union law due to incompatibility with Community rights.

Therefore the psychologist has been readmitted to her work and normal tasks without getting the vaccine