Discovery v NEASA
JUDGE FOR YOURSELF
Discovery made claims in public re C-19 jabs, without providing evidence to prove their claims. NEASA invited Discovery to engage in public debate. Discovery refused. NEASA sent Discovery a set of written questions seeking evidence for Discovery’s claims. Discovery’s written answers relied on authority rather than evidence. NEASA again asked Discovery to provide proper answers with evidence in writing and/or to engage in public debate. Discovery refused to engage any further. NEASA then sat down with experts to examine the evidence.
Please see 👇:-
A – Trail of correspondence.
B – Series of concise video recorded interviews examining the evidence.
Please JUDGE FOR YOURSELF
Trail of correspondence
CLICK TO VIEW
Series of concise video recorded interviews examining the evidence.
Part 1/8 COVID-19: Origin of the discussion. | The Controversy Continues
Part 3/8 COVID-19: Were SA citizens able to give informed consent? | The Controversy Continues
Part 5/8 mRNA/DNA Vaccines vs Childhood Vaccines. | The Controversy Continues
Part 7/8 The status of the ‘vaccine’. | The Controversy Continues
Part 2/8 COVID-19: Untrustworthy messages from the authorities. | The Controversy Continues
Part 4/8 Vaccines as a Covid mitigation measure. | The Controversy Continues
Part 6/8 COVID-19: Dismissing different views. | The Controversy Continues
Part 8/8 ‘Vaccine’ hesitancy and the use of mandates to overcome it. | The Controversy Continues